The fourth paralogism is passed over lightly or not treated at all by commentators.
From the en.wikipedia.org
It is questionable that the fourth paralogism should appear in a chapter on the soul.
From the en.wikipedia.org
Sometimes, the fourth paralogism is taken as one of the most awkward of Kant's invented tetrads.
From the en.wikipedia.org
It is a mistake that is the result of the first paralogism.
From the en.wikipedia.org
This paralogism mistakes the unity of apperception for the unity of an indivisible substance called the soul.
From the en.wikipedia.org
Once more, we are in the now familiar difficulty of the paralogism of Rational Psychology or of the Antinomies.
From the en.wikipedia.org
Nevertheless, in the fourth paralogism, there is a great deal of philosophizing about the self that goes beyond the mere refutation of idealism.
From the en.wikipedia.org
This paralogism misinterprets the metaphysical oneness of the subject by interpreting the unity of apperception as being indivisible and the soul simple as a result.
From the en.wikipedia.org
In the first edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, the fourth paralogism is addressed to refuting the thesis that there is no certainty of the existence of the external world.
From the en.wikipedia.org
More examples
An unintentionally invalid argument
In logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is a misconception resulting from incorrect reasoning in argumentation. By accident or design, fallacies may exploit emotional triggers in the listener or interlocutor (e.g. appeal to emotion), or take advantage of social relationships between people (e.g. ...
A fallacious argument or illogical conclusion, especially one committed by mistake, or believed by the speaker to be logical
Faulty reasoning. In formal logic, a fallacy in which the conclusion does not follow from the premises.