Ecological genetics concerns itself with observing microevolution in the wild.
From the en.wikipedia.org
This process is microevolution, which can be observed and described as fact.
From the sciencedaily.com
I don't understand the difference between microevolution and macroevolution.
From the en.wikipedia.org
Microevolution involves small-scale genetic changes in a species over time.
From the foxnews.com
Who knew that population genetics and microevolution had a place in creation science.
From the scienceblogs.com
Nearly all of the others accept nothing more than microevolution, just as do the YEC's.
From the scienceblogs.com
They tell me that although microevolution may be true, we don't see macroevolution happening.
From the scienceblogs.com
The meanings of microevolution and macroevolution seem to vary depending on who you talk to.
From the en.wikipedia.org
The majority of the article only discuss how microevolution is used for biological technology.
From the evangelicaloutpost.com
More examples
Evolution resulting from small specific genetic changes that can lead to a new subspecies
Microevolution is simply a change in gene frequency within a population. This change is due to four different processes: mutation, selection (natural and artificial), gene flow and genetic drift.
A small-scale evolutionary event such as the formation of a species from a preexisting one or the divergence of reproductively isolated populations into new species.
Evolution below the species level, i.e., of individuals and populations. See Gradualism.
Small-scale changes within existing species or gene pools.
Short-term evolutionary change. The study of microevolution focuses on changes in allele frequencies from one generation to the next.
Term used by evolutionists to describe relatively small changes in genetic variation that can be observed in populations
Evolution within species rather than at higher taxonomic levels. Some creationists have stretched the definition of microevolution far beyond any usage in biology, even to the point where all members of a taxonomic family might be considered the result of microevolution, and thus not "real" ...
Again, biologists don't recognize 'kinds' as a valid category of life, nor will they until such time as Creationists make up their minds about what these 'kinds' of theirs actually are. ...